Saturday, August 20, 2005

Interesting Wikipedia Links

I love reading Wikipedia! There are a number of Wikipedia articles that I found quite interesting. As you can see below, these articles deal with false teachings and controversies within Christianity (or rather people and organizations that associate themselves with Christianity).
  1. Apostolic-Prophetic Movement
  2. Benny Hinn
  3. Bill Gothard
  4. British Israelism
  5. Chinese Rites controversy
  6. Christian Identity
  7. Christian televangelist scandals
  8. Christian Reconstructionism
  9. Christian theological controversy
  10. Claims by Chick Publications
  11. Criticisms of Charismatic and Pentecostal belief
  12. Dominion Theology
  13. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
  14. Five-Fold Ministry
  15. Golden Sword Prophecy
  16. Great Apostasy
  17. Hallelujah diet
  18. Heavenly Mother
  19. Hell house
  20. Hillsong Church
  21. History of Christianity and homosexuality
  22. Homosexuality and Christianity
  23. Index Librorum Prohibitorum
  24. Jerusalem syndrome
  25. Jesus Seminar
  26. Jesus-Only doctrine
  27. Kenneth E. Hagin
  28. King-James-Only Movement
  29. Kingdom Now theology
  30. Latter Rain Movement
  31. Liberation theology
  32. Lost Ten Tribes
  33. Megachurch
  34. Mortification of the flesh
  35. New Apostolic Reformation
  36. New Perspective on Paul
  37. Oneness Pentecostal
  38. Open Theism
  39. Oral Roberts
  40. Process theology
  41. Queer Theology
  42. Quinquarticular Controversy
  43. Rhema Bible Church
  44. Rod Parsley
  45. Running the aisles
  46. Signs and Wonders
  47. Slain in the Spirit
  48. St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre
  49. Territorial Spirit
  50. Third Wave of the Holy Spirit
  51. Timeline of unfulfilled Christian Prophecy
  52. Toronto blessing
  53. Trinity Broadcasting Network
  54. Welcoming Congregation
  55. When God Was a Woman


Blogger me said...

it's interesting too for someone who is so grounded on the word of GOD to use reference from wikipedia who do not even have christian basis. so interesting.

22/8/05 12:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sigh... it's just to show what the world view of such things are. Why like that, me?

22/8/05 12:39 PM  
Blogger me said...

but why must he target benny hinn, mega churches? maybe he should try wiki calvinism and all his kind of beliefs.

23/8/05 10:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, what's wrong with exposing false teachers? These are people who prophecise prophecies that didn't come true. Then they go round telling people they are men of God. Tell me, will non-believers believe such a God? It's utterly wrong testimony they are giving to the unsaved.

23/8/05 11:20 PM  
Blogger :)X said...

Me me me, Benny Hinn... sigh... though there are so miracles at his crusade, I can't say much of the man except to say he is a false prophet.

False prophet: Someone who predicts some events in the name of God and yet no results.

Mind u, I am from a Charismatic church, but I cannot condone the way he losely use the name of the Lord in vain. I have one particular prophecy in mind when I say that (in case u think I am accusing him falsely). He said sometime in 1990 that God will "destroy" all the homosexuals and that Fidel Castrol will be assinated in the decade. These were not well documented and even recorded. It's 2005 now and, bro (sis??), the homosexuals are even more vocal now then ever and Castrol is still smoking Cigars in Havana.

If he is living in the Old Testament days, he will be stoned! It's by the grace of God that he is still standing today! How can a man of God use God's name in vain? Does God make mistakes? No way! So what does it make Benny Hinn to be? A false prophet.

The bible says in Matt 24 "For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect."

A man of God cannot be mishandle God's word or His name loosely. He will lose it's credibility. No one ones to cause division in the body of Christ. Quarreling amony believers is not good, but if one have to stand up for the authourity of Scripture, we have to take a stand! We have to expose the error so that no one will be deceived or continue to be deceived.

I pray that there will be more discernment among believers so that they will understand and appreciate the intentions of people such as "WooQ".

Do not be smart in your own eyes or be blinded by words of ur leaders. Let the Word of God be your teacher. Let it be the final authourity for all things. Test them, don't accpet everything just because it's labelled "Christian". I pray that many eyes will be opened.

Soli Del Gloria!

24/8/05 11:20 AM  
Blogger me said...

i'm not saying that this guy is wrong. i'm saying that why must he target certain issues but not ALL issues?

we must test all things and not be blinded. this i agree. pls do not accuse people.

but it's really funny to see ppl like wooq to just wiki things that he is against and not wiki his calvinism thoughts.

isn't it strange?

24/8/05 2:36 PM  
Blogger :)X said...


Did u feel offended by my reply that u think I am accusing u? I am sorry if u think I am accusing u. Or are u telling me not to any how accuse Benny Hinn? For that I do not apologise coz I am just stating documented facts.

I am not a calvinist, but I tend to favour the preaching of the reformed theologians because of their high regard to the Word rather than subjective things that are commonly preached by charismatics.

26/8/05 10:47 AM  
Anonymous gayle said...

hopefully to put an end to this issue:


28/8/05 10:54 PM  
Blogger nartz said...

me sounds like that howeveryouspellit yvaleaksdjflakvjf person.

using a different name of course.
cowardice maybe?

good that a secular source can provide information from a worldly perspective. done in a journalistic fashion, which i honestly see nothing wrong in because it still compiles facts.

thanks beowulf for compiling this whole list of good readings.

28/8/05 11:56 PM  
Blogger nartz said...

and we all face criticisms in life. when they do come,

deal with it.

reflect on your mistakes and do the necessary.

or alternatively, you can continue in your ways and keep insisting that youre ALWAYS right.

and continue to live in your perception of what is "true".

28/8/05 11:59 PM  
Anonymous museo de alfareria said...

Well, I do not really suppose this may work.

8/11/11 5:17 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home